Less than a week after hackers stole an estimated $6.3 billion from Binance, crypto is being forced to face another potential shock: a Democratic sweep that would put some of the industry’s most persistent critics in the driver’s seat of congressional oversight.
But unlike hacking, this threat has grown in plain sight. As of Tuesday morning, Kalshi Price Democratic control of the House at about 94% and the Senate at about 75%. This doesn’t mean the outcome is entirely crypto-driven, but a shift in congressional control would hardly be a surprise.
— (@)
What matters most is how Democrats to use this power, and whether events in Iran completely overwhelm political history.
If Democrats win the House, they will take control of committee investigations, with the power to hold hearings and subpoena documents or testimony. And they have already indicated where they will look.
The famous anti-crypto duo Elizabeth Warren and Maxine Waters began laying the groundwork in April 2025, ask the SEC to preserve the records regarding Trump’s World Liberty Financial and potential conflicts of interest. Other lawmakers have called for scrutiny of his $TRUMP memecoin, while Robert Garcia, the House’s top oversight Democrat, has identified the Trump family’s crypto and foreign business dealings as a priority for investigation.
— (@)
The Binance hack offers them another opening. In a Statement of October 30Waters linked the breach to Trump’s pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Binance’s ties to World Liberty. While these connections have no established connection to the hack itself, the breach gives Democrats another opportunity to push for stronger cybersecurity, financial crime safeguards and exchange accountability.
And maybe that’s not all bad. Given the hemorrhaging of crypto capital following recent hacks, additional oversight of exchange security might even help (please don’t see me eating my words here). What worries me is how far this surveillance will extend. Ideally, investigations remain focused on specific transactions rather than drawing unrelated companies into the crossfire. But prediction markets, which have their own ties to the Trump family, could also find themselves in the spotlight.
Donald Trump Jr. advises Kalshi and sits on it Polymarket Advisory Board after his company, 1789 Capital, invested last year. Warren pressed Republican attorneys general to release transcript after New York Times reported that Trump Jr. urged them not to pursue prediction markets. On Monday, four Democratic senators asked if Polymarket received preferential treatment for its advertisements.
The Democrats also introduced the STOP law on corrupt bettingwhich would ban contracts on elections, sports, government actions and war. This would touch the core of Kalshi’s business: sports and discussions were a significant part of Kalshi’s business. approximately 84% of its volume this year, compared to only 0.5% for the elections. And all of this comes amid an intensifying fight between the state and federal government over who will have the right to regulate these platforms. Like Dustin Gouker of The Event Horizon newsletter put it onthe congressional hearings we’ve seen so far might “look like ice cream parties” compared to what a Democratic Congress might bring.
Do you like this article?
Subscribe to Bankless or log in
Kalshi seems to be preparing for this eventuality, having hired a lobbying firm with ties to Hakeem Jeffries, who could become Speaker of the House. And as the CFTC defends prediction markets against state regulators, Congressional oversight of the platforms could extend to the agency itself.
But increased congressional oversight does not necessarily mean regulatory progress. stops.
Despite CLARITY’s failure in September, the SEC and CFTC continued to chart a course using their existing authority.
Just two days after CLARITY was blocked, the SEC granted a temporary exemption allowing eligible sites to trade tokenized US stocks on-chain. In October, the CFTC requested comments on the rules for leveraged crypto transactions and federally registered crypto markets. Today we brought an even more concrete sign of progress.
Michael Selig, Chairman of the CFTC announcement that perpetual stock futures could begin trading on eligible exchanges regulated in the United States. Platforms still need relevant registrations, product filings, and clearing agreements with the SEC and CFTC, but the regulatory path is now open. Payward has already filed to offer these perps via Bitnomial, while Lighter and Trade supported by ICE (XYZ) are pursuing their own regulatory path.
— (@)
This progress is not immune to political pressure. Warren has previously challenged the CFTC’s enforcement record and staff cutsand a Democratic Congress could subject agency decisions to greater scrutiny. But congressional control does not erase their existing authority. Investigations could accelerate even as regulatory approvals continue.
When it comes to prices, the least predictable force might be Iran. Reports last week suggested Trump was considering further large-scale strikes after the midterm elections, raising the prospect of higher oil prices, stubborn inflation and a further decline in risk assets.
Monday briefly brought relief. Trump has said he is in no rush to resume a major campaign, while diplomatic hopes have sent oil tumbling. But the Associated Press reported Monday evening that US forces had carried out limited strikes against Iranian targets near the Strait of Hormuz. A U.S. official described the strikes as defensive and negotiations remain active. The question now is whether these strikes will remain isolated or whether they will give way to a broader conflict.
— (@)
This distinction may ultimately determine the next step in cryptography. Investors have had weeks to prepare for a Democratic Congress, but what happens in Iran remains much less predictable and could matter more to markets than what happens in the United States.
Let’s hope for a quick resolution, and not just for our parts.
About the Author
